Caseflicks

Oregon Supreme Court • 1993

Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

859 P.2d 1143 | 317 Or. 606 | 1993 Ore. LEXIS 152

Full access

Unlock the video and quiz

The written brief is free to read below. Subscribe to watch the video explainer and take the quiz.

Create an account Log in

Takeaway

In short, this case established Oregon's text-and-context-first interpretive method and held that accrued sick leave may be used for parental leave unless the statute itself imposes a limitation.

Background

A PGE employee, represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers under a collective bargaining agreement, sought 12 weeks of parental leave following the birth of his child. He proposed to cover the leave with accrued vacation, three days of sick leave available for elective surgery, and nine weeks and two days of other accrued paid sick leave.

PGE refused to allow use of the sick leave because its collective bargaining agreement permitted sick leave only when the employee was actually ill or injured, or needed routine medical or dental care. The employee filed a complaint with the Bureau of Labor and Industries, alleging an unlawful employment practice under Oregon's parental-leave law.

BOLI ruled for the employee, concluding that ORS 659.360(3) entitled an employee to use accrued sick leave during parental leave without regard to restrictions in the collective bargaining agreement. It ordered PGE to pay the value of the denied leave and $2,000 for mental anguish and distress. The Court of Appeals affirmed in banc, over dissents, and PGE sought review in the Oregon Supreme Court.

Issues

Issue #1

Whether ORS 659.360(3) permits an employee to use accrued paid sick leave during parental leave even when the employee does not satisfy sick-leave eligibility conditions in a collective bargaining agreement.

Holding

Yes. An employee may use accrued sick leave during statutory parental leave, even if the employee is not sick and would otherwise be ineligible to use that leave under a collective bargaining agreement.

Reasoning

The court began with Oregon's statutory-interpretation framework: its task is to identify legislative intent by examining statutory text and context first. Text is ordinarily the best evidence of that intent, read according to ordinary meaning and applicable interpretive rules. Only if text and context do not clearly resolve the question may a court turn to legislative history; general maxims of construction come last if uncertainty remains.

The first sentence of ORS 659.360(3) states that an employee seeking parental leave "shall be entitled to utilize any accrued vacation leave, sick leave or other compensatory leave, paid or unpaid, during the parental leave." The decisive condition expressed in that sentence is that the leave be accrued. Nothing in the sentence says that use of accrued sick leave remains subject to the ordinary circumstances or contractual conditions that otherwise govern sick-leave use.

The subsection's second sentence confirms that reading. It allows an employer to require an employee to use accrued leave during parental leave, but expressly makes that employer power subject to an agreement between employer and employee, a collective bargaining agreement, or employer policy. By contrast, the first sentence grants the employee a reciprocal power to elect use of accrued leave and contains none of those qualifications.

The court would not insert into the first sentence a collective-bargaining limitation that the legislature included expressly in the second sentence. Had the legislature intended employees' right to use accrued leave to be qualified by contractual sick-leave restrictions, it knew how to say so. Because the text and statutory context were unambiguous, there was no need to consult legislative history.

Accordingly, the employee could require PGE to allow use of his accrued sick leave as part of parental leave. The court affirmed both the Court of Appeals' decision and BOLI's order.